YOUNG v. STATION 27, INC.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.
¶ 1 Plaintiff was injured, sought workers’ compensation benefits, and approximately thirteen months later her employment was terminated. Plaintiff filed a petition in the District Court and alleged she had been terminated from employment in retaliation for her workers’ compensation claim. She alleged her termination violated public policy and she possessed a tort claim pursuant .to Burk v. K-Mart Corp., 1 which entitled her to a jury trial in District Court. She alleged 85A O.S.Supp. 2013 7 of the Administrative Workers’ Compensation Act denied her a jury trial and violated Article 2 19 of…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Compsource Mut. Ins. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- I. T. K. v. MOUNDS PUBLIC SCHOOLSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- GAASCH v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.