Cash v. Southern Pacific Railroad
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
Action to quiet title. After the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of respondents, plaintiffs appealed. We affirm.
Facts:
In 1900, certain property of plaintiffs 1 in Chatsworth was acquired by respondents in condemnation proceedings. 2 The superior court awarded respondents “a right of way” to construct and operate a railroad and to use the land “for such other purposes as are necessary and incident to railroad construction, maintenance and operation.” Since then, respondents have operated a steam railroad on the main tracks for the purposes of local, intrastate,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Faus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Southern Pacific Co. v. HyattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Burke Concrete Accessories, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- City of San Gabriel v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Nowling v. BNSF RAILWAYNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Vieux v. County of AlamedaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
- Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990