Legal Opinion

Cash v. Southern Pacific Railroad

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 1981No. Civ. 61184PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

Action to quiet title. After the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of respondents, plaintiffs appealed. We affirm.

Facts:

In 1900, certain property of plaintiffs 1 in Chatsworth was acquired by respondents in condemnation proceedings. 2 The superior court awarded respondents “a right of way” to construct and operate a railroad and to use the land “for such other purposes as are necessary and incident to railroad construction, maintenance and operation.” Since then, respondents have operated a steam railroad on the main tracks for the purposes of local, intrastate,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Faus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. HyattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Burke Concrete Accessories, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. City of San Gabriel v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Nowling v. BNSF RAILWAYNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Vieux v. County of AlamedaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
  5. Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API