Legal Opinion

Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1990No. S007919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

50 Cal.3d 370 (1990)

787 P.2d 976

267 Cal. Rptr. 569

NAPA VALLEY WINE TRAIN, INC., Petitioner,

v.

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Respondent; CITY OF ST. HELENA et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Docket No. S007919.

Supreme Court of California.

March 19, 1990.

COUNSEL

Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Douglas P. Ley, Peter H. Goldsmith, Christopher M. Patti and Victor D. Ryerson for Petitioner.

Janice E. Kerr, Michael B. Day and Gretchen T. Dumas for Respondent.

Meyers, Nave, Riback & West, Michael S. Riback and Michael F. Rodriguez for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

PANELLI, J. —

I. INTRODUCTION

In this…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API