Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
50 Cal.3d 370 (1990)
787 P.2d 976
267 Cal. Rptr. 569
NAPA VALLEY WINE TRAIN, INC., Petitioner,
v.
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Respondent; CITY OF ST. HELENA et al., Real Parties in Interest.
Docket No. S007919.
Supreme Court of California.
March 19, 1990.
COUNSEL
Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Douglas P. Ley, Peter H. Goldsmith, Christopher M. Patti and Victor D. Ryerson for Petitioner.
Janice E. Kerr, Michael B. Day and Gretchen T. Dumas for Respondent.
Meyers, Nave, Riback & West, Michael S. Riback and Michael F. Rodriguez for Real Parties in Interest.
OPINION
PANELLI, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015