Legal Opinion

City of San Gabriel v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1933No. Docket No. 8292PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The City of San Gabriel brought this action, under the Acquisition and Improvement Act of 1925”, to condemn, for the widening of Las Tunas Drive, a strip of land 32 feet wide and 5,912 feet long, used by respondent Pacific Electric Railway Company (hereinafter called the company) as part of its right of way for the operation of its interurban electric railway between Los Angeles and San Gabriel. As to 300 feet in length of such strip, appellants owned the fee, subject to an easement in favor of the company. The remaining length was owned in fee by the company. The interlocutory…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Southern Pacific Railroad v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Simoneau v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. HeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Romero v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API