Legal Opinion

Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1990No. S007919PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PANELLI, J.—

I. Introduction

In this case we consider whether the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21000 to 21177) (hereafter CEQA)1 applies to a plan by the Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. (Wine Train), to carry passengers on an existing 21-mile railroad line through California’s Napa Valley. Believing that CEQA does apply, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) ordered Wine Train not to begin passenger service until after submitting to an environmental review process. We hold, however, in accordance with an express statutory exemption, that CEQA does not apply…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. In Re HoddinottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API