Wilson v. Wilson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.*
Defendants appeal from a summary judgment entered against them in an action on a promissory note. They also appeal from an order sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to their counterclaim and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a summary judgment. These orders are not appealable (Jeffers v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., *266107 Cal.App.2d 253, 254 [237 P.2d 51] ; Schulze v. Schulze, 121 Cal.App.2d 75, 83 [262 P.2d 646]), and the attempted appeals therefrom will be dismissed.
The controlling question is whether the trial court ■properly granted plaintiff’s motion for a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Coast Bank v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.