Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KUSSMAN, J. *
INTRODUCTION
This is the latest of multiple appeals in a case in which courts have been called upon to determine the amount of rent a pipeline company must pay to a railroad for the use of land underneath its rights-of-way, most of which were initially granted to it by the federal government beginning in the mid-19th century in order to build and operate transcontinental railroads. The rent is to be determined by the terms of a settlement agreement entered into in 1994 arising out of previous litigation between the parties — former sister companies that separated and have…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Barahona v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Copart, Inc. v. Sparta Consulting, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Ayala v. Dawson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Garcia v. Garcia (In re Garcia), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Hart High-Voltage Apparatus Repair & Testing Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.