Legal Opinion

Anger v. Borden

California Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1951No. L. A. 21519PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

In this action for partition and to quiet title brought against several defendants, plaintiff appeals from that portion of the decree granting such relief as to two parcels of property wherein the respective rights of plaintiff and defendant city of Pasadena are involved. The appeal is presented on an agreed statement, wherefrom it appears that plaintiff objects to the trial court’s (1) rejection of the Ren of plaintiff’s improvement bond as an enforceable claim; (2) fixing of the quantum of defendant city’s Ren against the property; and (3) disaRowance of attorney fees insofar as the quiet…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scheas v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Rombotis v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Monheit v. CignaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Los Angeles Trust & Saving Bank v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Elbert, Ltd. v. NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Wiener v. Van WinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Freeman v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Harless v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Arthur B. Siri, Inc. v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API