Legal Opinion
Rombotis v. Fink
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 1948No. Civ. 16450PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiff and cross-defendant has appealed from a judgment of the superior court refusing to quiet his title to real property against the lien of a street improvement bond held by defendant and decreeing foreclosure of such bond on defendant’s cross-complaint.
The undisputed facts are that plaintiff holds fee title to the real property in question, which title he acquired as a “bona fide purchaser for value” on August 18, 1947. Defendant holds Street Improvement Bond 28, County Improvement No. 716, issued under the County Improvement Act of 1921 (Stats. 1921, p. 1658). This bond was issued as…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Scheas v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Kupka v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Gregg v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.