Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Trust & Saving Bank v. Ward

California Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1925No. Docket No. L.A. 7906PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, Acting C. J.

This is an action of inter-pleader. The defendant Shirley C. Ward was lessee of certain premises situated in the city of Los Angeles under a lease from the owner, Delia Gilman. The premises were sublet by said defendant to the defendant Walter H. Fisher. Subsequently, by written agreement of the two named defendants, the plaintiff was made escrow-holder of a certain agreement dated August 19, 1918, entered into and executed, in duplicate, by them. This agreement modified in certain particulars the rights and obligations of the parties thereto in and to the premises referred to above. By the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Bates v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Brooks v. ForingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Miller v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Seibel v. HighamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. A. J. Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. NakanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Piuma v. MinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Erich v. GranoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API