Legal Opinion
Wiener v. Van Winkle
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 1969No. Civ. 32542PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
The original complaint of plaintiffs George M. Wiener and Herbert D. Wiener (hereinafter, the Wieners) was filed on June 6, 1966. It was framed in two causes of action. The first cause of action sought to impose liability on defendants F. L. Van Winkle and Helen E. Van Winkle (hereinafter, the Van Winkles) as guarantors of a, promissory note. The second cause of 'action sought to impose liability on the Van Winkles as indorsers of the same note. The Van Winkles’ answer was filed June 17,1966.
By stipulation, the Wieners’ first amended complaint was filed. It was framed in five causes of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Bloom v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Citizens Suburban Co. v. Rosemont Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Coast Bank v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Arnold v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- United California Bank v. THC Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Staples v. HoefkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.