Legal Opinion

Scheas v. Robertson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1951No. L. A. 21357PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for partition asserting the lien of an unforeelosed street improvement bond against a certain parcel of realty. The trial court determined from the undisputed facts that plaintiff’s action was not com menced within the time allowed by applicable legislation enacted in 1945, and that defendants, as bona fide purchasers for value, took title to the property free from the alleged lien. Accordingly, judgment was entered for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

As grounds for reversal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in holding: (1) that the action was not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Comptroller of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Fontana Land Co. v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Rombotis v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. MaxfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hambrecht & Quist Venture Partners v. American Medical International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Stafford v. Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API