Legal Opinion
Arthur B. Siri, Inc. v. Bridges
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 1, 1961No. Civ. 9957PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
L. V. Bridges has appealed from a judgment in favor of Arthur B. Siri, Inc., a California corporation, which judgment determined that the corporation has a valid lien on certain real property owned by Bridges and which ordered that the lien be foreclosed.
In February 1956, Bridges entered into a contract with defendants Gerhardt and Trotman whereby the .former agreed to sell certain real property for $24,000, and Gerhardt and Trotman, who were building contractors, agreed to subdivide the property, grade and surface the streets, and build a home on.each of the 12 lots. It was also agreed that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- English v. Olympic Auditorium, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Anger v. BordenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Orondo MinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arnold v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Citizens Suburban Co. v. Rosemont Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Scott, Blake & Wynne v. Summit Ridge Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Walker v. Lytton Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Wilson's Heating & Air Conditioning v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.