Ridgway v. Salrin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
In this proceeding to foreclose a mortgage the plaintiff has appealed from a judgment which was rendered against him to the effect that he take nothing in this suit for the reason that the action was barred by the provisions of section 337 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
It is contended the statute of limitations was tolled by the provisions of section 351 of the Code of Civil Procedure for the reason that the respondent, Sarah S. Salrin, the sister of plaintiff, to whom the mortgaged premises were conveyed by the mortgagor after the vesting of the mortgage lien, was at all times a resident of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Watt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Blumberg v. BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Churchill v. WoodworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Hogaboom v. FlowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Fielding v. IlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pablo Marrero Morales, Libellant v. Bull Steamship CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
- Moss v. Standard Drug Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1952
- Vogt v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Geomat and Sons, Inc. v. Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, Ltd.District Court, D. Guam · 2011
- Pablo Marrero Morales, Libellant v. Bull Steamship CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960