Churchill v. Woodworth
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action brought by plaintiffs to have a deed absolute in form declared to be a mortgage, and to foreclose the same. Plaintiffs had judgment, and defendant Jones, administrator of the estate of L. B. Wood-worth, deceased, appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Said Woodworth, on November 8, 1894, being indebted to plaintiffs-as administrators of the estate of Charles B. Boyes, deceased, executed to Jerome Churchill a deed conveying certain real estate in the city of Los Angeles, which deed was in form an absolute conveyance, but was executed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. CerfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by19 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Foster & Kleiser Co. v. Special Site Sign Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Hydro-Mill Co. v. Hayward, Tilton & Rolapp Insurance Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.