Legal Opinion

Churchill v. Woodworth

California Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1906No. L.A. No. 1588PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiffs to have a deed absolute in form declared to be a mortgage, and to foreclose the same. Plaintiffs had judgment, and defendant Jones, administrator of the estate of L. B. Wood-worth, deceased, appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Said Woodworth, on November 8, 1894, being indebted to plaintiffs-as administrators of the estate of Charles B. Boyes, deceased, executed to Jerome Churchill a deed conveying certain real estate in the city of Los Angeles, which deed was in form an absolute conveyance, but was executed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. CerfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Foster & Kleiser Co. v. Special Site Sign Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. Hydro-Mill Co. v. Hayward, Tilton & Rolapp Insurance Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API