Legal Opinion
Geomat and Sons, Inc. v. Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, Ltd.
District Court, D. Guam
Decided March 25, 2011No. 1:10-cv-00001Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 DISTRICT COURT OF GUAM 7 TERRITORY OF GUAM 8 9 GEOMAT & SONS, INC. Civil Case No. 10-00001 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 HONG KONG AND SHANGHAI ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S BANKING CORPORATION LTD., MOTION TO DISMISS 14 Defendant. 15 16 This case is before the court on the Defendant, Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking 17 Corporation, Ltd.’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Docket No. 26. Pursuant to Local 18 Rule 7.1(e)(3), this matter is appropriate for decision without the need for oral argument.1 After 19 reviewing the parties’ submissions, as well as relevant caselaw and authority, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- American International Underwriters, (Philippines), Inc., a Philippines Corporation v. The Continental Insurance Company, a New Hampshire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Avi Nakash, Joe Nakash, and Ralph Nakash v. Georges Marciano, Maurice Marciano, Armand Marciano, Paul MarcianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.