Legal Opinion

Blumberg v. Birch

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1893No. 19164PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Ventura County. The facts are stated iu the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

It is alleged iu the amended complaint in this case that, on the thirteenth day of August, 1887, the defendant executed and delivered to the plaintiff his promissory note and a mortgage on certain real property to secure payment of the same; that on the 15th of December, 1890, the plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant in the superior court of Ventura County to foreclose the said mortgage, and that a summons in the action was issued and served on the defendant by publication only, he being then a non-resident of this state and absent therefrom; that defendant did not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Anderson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Allin v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Vandewater v. McRaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Savings Bank of San Diego v. Central Market Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Merced Security Savings Bank v. CasacciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Felton v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Taylor v. Continental Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API