Legal Opinion

Hogaboom v. Flower

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1903No. 13,096PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Shawnee district court; Z. T. Hazen, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J.:

This action was brought by Henry O. Flower to quiet his title to lots 23 and 25 on West street, Thurston Place addition to the city of Topeka. Mary Hogaboom, one of the defendants, by way of cross-petition pleaded a mortgage executed by Halleck Hill and wife on the real estate, and asked that it be declared a lien thereon and foreclosed. This answer disclosed that more than five years had elapsed from the maturity of the note and the filing of the cross-petition. To avoid the bar of the statute of limitations, it was alleged that by a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beebe v. DosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Smalley v. BowlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Donald v. StybrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Campbell v. StaggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Colonial & United States Mortgage Co. v. Northwest Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Herthel v. BarthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Freeman v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Gibson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. Coakley v. PhelanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API