Legal Opinion
Anderson v. State, Department of Revenue
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 2001No. S-9418PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
I,. INTRODUCTION
Douglas Anderson and his son appeal from a decision denying them their 1997 Permanent Fund Dividends. Because the record supports the department's finding that Anderson failed to overcome the presumption of non-residency for those absent from the state more than five years, the department's written decision was adequate, and the department did not misinterpret its own regulations, we affirm the superior court's decision.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Douglas Anderson is an active-duty Coast Guard officer. Although he grew up in Ke-nai and Soldotna, Anderson moved away from…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- State, Department of Revenue, Permanent Fund Dividend Division v. CosioAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies v. GomesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Church v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Button v. Haines BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Harrod v. State, Dept. of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Eagle v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Hawken Northwest, Inc. v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Alaskan Crude Corporation v. State, Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.