Legal Opinion
Eagle v. State, Department of Revenue
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 2007No. S-12004PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Peter Eagle, a former Navy servicemem-ber, claims that he was a resident of Alaska for purposes of receiving a 2008 Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD). The Permanent Fund Dividend Division of the Department of Revenue (the Division) rejected his application because he failed to rebut the statutory presumption that his absence from Alaska for more than five years indicated an intent not to return to the state. Eagle primarily argues that the Federal Soldiers' and Sailors Civil Relief Act (the SSCRA) preempts Alaskan law by preserving his residency for the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- State, Department of Health & Social Services v. Planned Parenthood of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Clemensen v. Providence Alaska Medical CenterAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Harrod v. State, Dept. of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Patterson v. GEICO General Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Ross v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.