Alaskan Crude Corporation v. State, Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAASSEN, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Alaskan Crude Corporation submitted an application to the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission to reopen the Burglin 383-1 well, a suspended well on the North Slope, to explore for oil and gas. Arguing that it was highly unlikely that oil from the well would rise to the surface unassisted, Alaskan Crude made a series of requests to the Commission to be exempted from oil discharge response requirements or, in the alternative, to have the requirements reduced. The Commission made successive reductions to the technical flow-rate assessments and the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. LindAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oakly Enterprises, LLC v. NPI, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- State, Dept. of Natural Resources v. Alaskan Crude CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Olivera v. Rude-OliveraAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Blas v. State, Department of Labor & Workforce Development, Division of Employment SecurityAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources v. Alaskan Crude Corporation and James M. White, James M. White v. State of Alaska, DNR, and Alaskan Crude Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018