Legal Opinion

Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies v. Gomes

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1976No. 2421PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1014OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RA-BINOWITZ, CONNOR, ERWIN and BURKE, JJ. BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice.

The bizarre murder of Raymond J. Gomes gives rise to this appeal concerning the statutory presumption of compensability contained in the Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Act. Gomes’ employer, Beef & Bourbon, and its insurance carrier, Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Companies (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the employer”), seek reversal of the superior court’s affirmance of the Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Board’s finding of compensability.1 The employer contends there was…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. J. E. Riley Investment Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Del Vecchio v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Keiner v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Veco, Inc. v. WolferAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. A & G Const. Co., Inc. v. Reid Brothers Logging Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. JacobAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API