Legal Opinion

Church v. State, Department of Revenue

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1999No. S-7606PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant Patrick Church was denied a 1993 Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) because he-was absent from the state for 274 days in 1992 while caring for his dying mother. At the time of his absence, caring for a terminally-ill relative was not an excusable absence for PFD purposes. 1 Church challenges the denial of his PFD, arguing that the Department of Revenue did not have authority to adopt certain PFD regulations, that the regulations and statutes defining a resident for PFD purposes were unreasonable and arbitrary, and that the Department of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Martinez Ex Rel. Morales v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State, Department of Revenue, Permanent Fund Dividend Division v. CosioAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State, Department of Health & Social Services v. Planned Parenthood of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State, Department of Revenue v. AndradeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Wilkerson v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API