Church v. State, Department of Revenue
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellant Patrick Church was denied a 1993 Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) because he-was absent from the state for 274 days in 1992 while caring for his dying mother. At the time of his absence, caring for a terminally-ill relative was not an excusable absence for PFD purposes. 1 Church challenges the denial of his PFD, arguing that the Department of Revenue did not have authority to adopt certain PFD regulations, that the regulations and statutes defining a resident for PFD purposes were unreasonable and arbitrary, and that the Department of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Martinez Ex Rel. Morales v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- State, Department of Revenue, Permanent Fund Dividend Division v. CosioAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State, Department of Health & Social Services v. Planned Parenthood of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- State, Department of Revenue v. AndradeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Wilkerson v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.