Legal Opinion

Button v. Haines Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2009No. S-12796PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Based on two criminal convictions and complaints from customers and other tour operators, the clerk of the Haines Borough denied Dave Button's 2005 application for renewal of his commercial tour permit. Button appealed to the borough manager, who upheld the denial after conducting an eight-day evidentiary hearing. The borough assembly and the superior court affirmed. Button appeals. We hold that substantial evidence supported five of the manager's seven factual findings; that those five findings were sufficient to justify denial; that the borough did…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re the Estate of HutchinsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Grimm v. WagonerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. James v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Alaskan Crude Corp. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Gottstein v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Hill v. GianiAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Nicolos v. North Slope BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API