Cron v. Zimmer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a general judgment dismissing their interference with economic relations, conversion, and unjust enrichment claims. Plaintiffs assign error to the trial court’s grant of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude that plaintiffs demonstrated sufficient evidence for a trial on their interference with economic relations, conversion, and unjust enrichment claims, we reverse and remand.
We state the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, plaintiffs in this case, to determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Mustola v. ToddyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Abercrombie v. Hayden Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wilson v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Copeland Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Estate of DillardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Sharma v. Providence Health & Services-OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Unigestion Holding, S.A. v. UPM Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Burgdorf v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.