Ahlgren v. Walsh
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Garret W. McEnerney, and Andrew F. Burke, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant, Julia A. Walsh, appeals from the judgment, and also from an order denying her motion for new trial.
The action was begun to recover an installment of a contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendants, whereby the plaintiff agreed to construct certain portions of a nine flat frame building for the defendants upon a lot in San Francisco. The contract was executed on October 25, 1905. The contract price was $23,763, to be paid “at times and in the manner following, to-wit: First:—$1000 when concrete foundations are built. Second:—$2400, when the frame is up.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tompkins v. . DudleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Polack v. PiocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Chidester v. Consolidated Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
- Fay v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Wilmington Transportation Co. v. O'NeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hamer v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Patrick J. Ruane, Inc. v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Kennedy v. ReeceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Orr v. FordeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.