Fay v. Pacific Improvement Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Upon further consideration of this cause, after hearing in Bank, we are satisfied with the conclusion reached in Department, and with the opinion there rendered, and for the reasons stated in said opinion, the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
Beatty, C. J., and Paterson, J., dissented.
The following is the opinion of Department Two, above referred to, rendered on the 23d of June, 1891: —
De Haven, J.
The plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant for damages occasioned by the loss of her jewelry, wearing apparel, and other articles of personal property needed for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hulett v. . SwiftNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Pinkerton v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Hancock v. . RandNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Jalie v. CardinalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Chicago & Northwestern Railroad v. SawyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Powers v. RaymondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Irelan-Yuba Gold Quartz Mining Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Langford v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Humburd v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Piluso v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.