Legal Opinion
Kennedy v. Reece
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 19, 1964No. Civ. 314PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment adverse to him on his complaint and favorable to the defendants on their counterclaim. The plaintiff, Fred Kennedy, made a contract with Reece and Thomas, mining partners, to drill a water well for them; the agreement, on the letterhead of the Fred Kennedy Company, reads as follows:
“We propose to furnish all materials and perform all labor necessary to complete the following:
“drill 12” hole to estimated depth of 400’ 3.50 per ft. ease with new 6” well casing with bottom half perforated gravel pack, wash well and bail. 1.50 per ft.
“All of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lloyd v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Mineral Park Land Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bumby & Stimpson, Inc. v. Peninsula Utilities Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- G. W. Andersen Construction Co. v. Mars SalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In the Matter of Ocean Air Tradeways, Inc., Bankrupt No. 90989. Ocean Air Tradeways, Inc. v. Arkay Realty Corp. And Duncan, Korb & Trimble, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Ellison v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Kennedy v. ReeceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.