Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. Rea
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Charles S. Wheeler, John P. Bowie, Nathan Moran, A. A. Heer and Moran & Heer for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
The complaint in this action purported to state two causes of action, one for money claimed as rent and one for money claimed as damages for the breach of an alleged covenant to rebuild. The action was prosecuted against defendants Rea, Kehrlein, and Sullivan, the original lessees, against Fillmore Arcade Company, a corporation, the assignee of the lease, and against the remaining defendants as stockholders in the latter corporation.
The undisputed facts are these: On July 1, 1906, the original lessees accepted a lease of the premises in question. By this lease they obligated themselves to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Samuels v. OttingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Bemmerly v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Polack v. PiocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Fuchs Murane v. GoeWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
- Beckett v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.