Legal Opinion

Orr v. Forde

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1929No. Docket No. 3901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The complaint contains two counts. In the first it is alleged that, pursuant to the terms of a contract between the parties, “plaintiff drilled a well to the depth of 940 feet, and that said well was drilled in a proper and skillful manner and was fully completed; . . . that said well . . . was received and accepted by said defendant”; that the defendant became indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $400 “for the moving of the well-rigging rig onto said property” and in the further sum of $367.50 “for the perforating and finishing up of said well.” In the second count it is alleged that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Mineral Park Land Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Carlson v. SheehanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Metzler v. ThyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Palmer v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. City of Vernon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Andriola v. MilliganNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Kennedy v. ReeceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Quinn v. LittenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API