Legal Opinion
Mavity v. Fraas
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 10, 2006No. Civil Action 05-0107 (RMU)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment 1
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff, Sharon Mavity, brings a pro se suit for legal malpractice against Phillip Fraas and the law firm Hogan & Hartson. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants committed legal malpractice in connection with their representation of her gender discrimination claims at both the administrative level and the district court level. The defendants move for summary judgment on the grounds that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Dennis Diamond, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Brian Atwood, Administrator, Agency for International Development, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Williams v. CallaghanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carranza v. FraasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Eisenrich v. Minneapolis Retail Meat Cutters & Food Handlers Pension PlanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Carranza v. FraasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Marbury Law Group, Pllc v. CarlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Ward v. MayorkasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026