Legal Opinion
Carranza v. Fraas
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 7, 2011No. Civil Action 05-0117 (RMU)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Relief Upon Reconsideration; Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendant’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment Without Prejudice
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs are female farmers who hired the defendant, attorney Phillip Fraas, to represent them in a civil rights discrimination claim against the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”). After settlement negotiations with the USDA failed, the plaintiffs commenced this action against the defendant for legal malpractice and breach of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Dennis Diamond, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Brian Atwood, Administrator, Agency for International Development, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Knop v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estate of Gaither Ex Rel. Gaither v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Patton Boggs, LLP v. CHEVRON CORPORATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Doe v. CabreraDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Carranza v. FRAASDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Gadaire v. OrchinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.