Legal Opinion

Williams v. Callaghan

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 10, 1996No. Civil Action 95-02335PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this action against his former criminal defense trial attorney, alleging that certain of defendant’s trial tactics caused plaintiffs conviction for drug distribution. Plaintiff asserts two causes of action: (1) legal malpractice; and (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiffs allegations are supported solely by plaintiffs own affidavit. Defendant moves for summary judgment.

BACKGROUND

On September 14, 1990, plaintiff, represented by defendant at trial, was convicted of distribution of a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  4. Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  5. Sere v. Group Hospitalization, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. N.S. Ex Rel. Stein v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Robinson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. William Armstrong v. Karen ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Smith v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Pollard v. Quest DiagnosticsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API