Legal Opinion

Carranza v. Fraas

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 7, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2005-0117Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA A. MARGARET CARRANZA et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 05-0117 (RMU) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 29, 30 : PHILLIP FRAAS, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING THE PLAINTIFFS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR RELIEF UPON RECONSIDERATION; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs are female farmers who hired the defendant, attorney Phillip Fraas, to represent them in a civil rights discrimination claim against the United States Department of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. Dennis Diamond, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Brian Atwood, Administrator, Agency for International Development, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  5. Knop v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API