Legal Opinion
Eisenrich v. Minneapolis Retail Meat Cutters & Food Handlers Pension Plan
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 3, 2008No. Civ. 07-1845 (RHK/JSM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this action, Plaintiff Thomas Eisen-rich has sued his former pension plan, the Minneapolis Retail Meat Cutters & Food Handlers Pension Plan (the “Plan”), alleging that the Plan improperly suspended his pension payments. Eisenrich appealed the suspension to the Plan’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”), but his appeal was denied; he then commenced the instant action. Presently pending before the Court is the Plan’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts 2 and 3 of Eisenrich’s Complaint. 1 For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Drexel Finley and Grace Finley v. Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tapley v. Locals 302 & 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Eisenrich v. Minneapolis Retail Meat Cutters & Food Handlers Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Ohio Public Employees Retirement System v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- Thomas Eisenrich v. Minneapolis Retail MeatCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009