Legal Opinion

Marbury Law Group, Pllc v. Carl

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 21, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2009-1402Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARBURY LAW GROUP, PLLC, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. Civil Action No. 09-01402 (CKK) BERNARD J. CARL, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION (July 21, 2013) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Marbury Law Group, PLLC (“Marbury”) has moved for summary judgment on counterclaims brought by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bernard J. Carl (“Carl”), who is proceeding pro se in this action. 1 Carl’s three counterclaims – the only claims that remain at issue in this case – sound in legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty and all…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Arrington, Derreck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  5. Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global MinistriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API