Legal Opinion

Smith v. Washington County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 10, 2002No. C98-0531CV; A106905PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, P. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action seeking a declaration that certain security procedures implemented as a condition of entry into the Washington County court facilities, together with the order of the presiding judge authorizing those procedures, violate Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to ORCP 21 B, concluding that, under the allegations of the complaint, the challenged procedures are constitutional. Plaintiffs appeal from the resulting judgment, primarily challenging the grant of defendants’…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Weber v. Oakridge School District 76Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Caldeen Construction, LLC v. KempCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. A. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Menasha Forest Products Corp. v. Curry County Title, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API