Ortwein v. Schwab
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
410 U.S. 656 (1973)
ORTWEIN ET AL.
v.
SCHWAB ET AL.
No. 72-5431.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided March 5, 1973.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
2Per curiam
Appellants contend that Oregon's $25 appellate court filing fee, as applied in this case, violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and, also, the First Amendment as incorporated into the Fourteenth. The Supreme Court of Oregon decided otherwise. 262 Ore. 375, 498 P. 2d 757 (1972). We affirm that decision for reasons we found persuasive in United States v. Kras, 409 U. S. 434 (1973).
Appellant Ortwein…
Also in this document: Dissent · Douglas; Dissent · Brennan; Dissent · Marshall.
3Cases cited25 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by298 opinions
- Jerardo Rodriguez v. David Cook, Director, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Bazley v. TortorichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Betty J. Archie v. City of Racine, Ronald W. Chiapete, and George W. GieseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Arthur X. Carson v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Everett v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
293 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.