Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Lane County
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1987No. TC 16-83-05689; CA A32607; SC S33066; TC 16-83-05689; CA A32607; SC S33082; TC 16-83-05689; CA A32607; SC S33115PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*100CARSON, J.
This is the first of three cases we decide today involving the legality of sobriety roadblocks (that is, roadblocks conducted for the purpose of discovering persons driving while under the influence of intoxicants). The two companion cases are appeals from criminal convictions in which we held that state and local officials violated Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or 131, 743 P2d 711 (1987); State v. Anderson, 304 Or 139, 743 P2d 715 (1987).
The present case is an appeal from a civil judgment in which plaintiff seeks civil remedies against…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. WilliamsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.