Legal Opinion
Weber v. Oakridge School District 76
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 23, 2002No. 16-00-21584; A114141PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*417LANDAU, P. J.
Oakridge School District 76 (the district) adopted a drug-testing policy requiring all students who wish to participate in extracurricular school athletics to consent to random urinalysis testing throughout the school year and to disclose any use of prescription medications. Ginelle Weber, a student at Oakridge High School, tried out for and made the school’s volleyball team. But she and her parents refused to consent to the random urinalysis and disclosure requirements. The school excluded her from the team. Her parents, John and Shannon Weber (plaintiffs), initiated this action…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hageman Ex Rel. C v. Goshen County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Courter v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. A. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. StoudamireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.