Legal Opinion

Caldeen Construction, LLC v. Kemp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 8, 2012No. 090645745; A143946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint against defendant, 1 alleging legal malpractice. Pursuant to ORCP 21 A(8), defendant moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. The trial court granted the motion and denied plaintiffs’ request for leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs appeal, asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by denying them leave to file an amended complaint. We agree and, therefore, reverse and remand.

We begin with the relevant facts, which are few and undisputed. Plaintiffs hired defendant to represent them in a contract dispute. Defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Palmer v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Scott & Payne v. Potomac Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Ramsey v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Slogowski v. LynessOregon Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. O'Neil v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Herinckx v. SanelleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Lamka v. KeyBankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Jensen v. DuboffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Field v. MyrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API