Legal Opinion
Kytasty v. Godwin
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 26, 1980No. Civ. 18090PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLOGNE, Acting P. J.
Helen Kytasty brought this action to quiet title to her property over which the defendants claimed an easement. In the first trial, the court awarded Kytasty judgment and ordered defendant M. F. Godwin to convey title to the subject parcel free and clear of easements. This judgment was modified granting the 60-foot easement, but a new trial was ordered because, among other reasons, indispensable parties were not before the court. After the retrial, the trial court awarded judgment confirming a 60-foot easement on Kytasty’s property in favor of certain of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Fristoe v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Quinlan v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Henrici v. South Feather Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Orr v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Nasser v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
- de la Cuesta v. BenhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.