Legal Opinion

Orr v. Kirk

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1950No. Civ. 4156PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Action for declaratory relief and injunction. In 1919, plaintiff’s predecessor in interest, Mr. Mann, owned and lived in a house located on a 4-acre tract of land in Ontario. The title to the property, as a whole, passed from Mann to Mr. and Mrs. Gist in 1933, who sold the east half of their land to defendants’ predecessors in interest and retained that property now owned by the plaintiff. At that time and prior thereto there was a “U” shaped driveway commencing at “A” Street and running, northerly along the west side of plaintiff’s house. It then led around to the rear of her house and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Fristoe v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Smith v. SkrbekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Bassi v. BassiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Lapique v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Tusher v. GabrielsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Kytasty v. GodwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Freightways Terminal Co. v. Industrial & Commercial Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API