Legal Opinion
Nasser v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 18, 1984No. Civ. 33224PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRIS, P. J.
Petitioner seeks a peremptory writ of mandate to vacate an order of the respondent court denying attorney fees under Civil Code section 1717. 1 This court granted an alternative writ. We are now persuaded that the peremptory writ should be denied.
Facts
Petitioner, Ghazi Nasser, operates a market on leased premises in the City of Fontana. His landlords are Joseph and Nathalie Gay dos, the real parties in interest (hereafter lessors). Petitioner’s lease was for a term of five years, with a three-year option to renew. The rent during the five-year period was $350 for the first…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Noroian v. Department of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Smith v. KruegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Sears v. BaccaglioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Ajaxo Inc. v. E Trade Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc. v. Downey Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.