Henrici v. South Feather Land & Water Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff, owner of a tract of land in Butte County, containing about twenty-acres, brought this action to recover damages for the failure and refusal of the defendant, a water company, to furnish water for the irrigation of his land. The trial was had before the court sitting without a jury, and the court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $1,176. The defendant appeals from the judgment, bringing up the evidence by means of a typewritten transcript.
The defendant is the successor in interest of South Feather Water and Union Mining Company (hereinafter termed the “old…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Dillon v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. RowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Murphy v. KerrDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1923
- Green v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Mayes v. Sturdy Northern Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Schultz v. Town of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.