Flynn v. Chiappari
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
The defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs foreclosing certain liens for street work under the street improvement ordinance of San Francisco adopted in 1913. The following rough description of the physical situation, while not strictly accurate, will suffice to illustrate the questions raised herein: Lane Street, running northeast and southwest, is intersected at right angles by Wallace Avenue, running southeast and northwest. These two, in turn, are crossed by Railroad Avenue, running north and south. The last-named street overlaps, in part, the intersection of the two…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment No. 6California Supreme Court · 1923
- O. T. Johnson Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Carr v. KingsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Todd v. City of VisaliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Walsh v. SwansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.