Legal Opinion

French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 29, 1901No. 498PublishedCited by 303 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF MISSOURI. This was a suit instituted in the circuit court of Jackson County, Missouri, by the Barber ’Asphalt Paving Company, a corporation whose business it was to construct pavements com-. posed of asphalt, against Margaret French and others, owners of lots abutting on Forest avenue in Kansas City, for the purpose of enforcing the lien of a tax bill issued by that city in part payment of the cost of paving said avenue. ..

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF MISSOURI. This was a suit instituted in the circuit court of Jackson County, Missouri, by the Barber ’Asphalt Paving Company, a corporation whose business it was to construct pavements com-. posed of asphalt, against Margaret French and others, owners of lots abutting on Forest avenue in Kansas City, for the purpose of enforcing the lien of a tax bill issued by that city in part payment of the cost of paving said avenue. .. The work was done conformably to the requirements of the Kansas City charter, by the adoption of a resolution by the common…

1Opinion of the Court

• MR. Justice Shiras,

after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

In itb opinion in this case the Supreme Court of Missouri said that “the method adopted in the charter, and ordinance of Kansas City of charging the cost of paving Forest avenue against the adjoining lots according to their frontage had been répeat-edly authorized by the legislature of Missouri, and such laws had received the sanction of this court in many decisions. St. Louis v. Allen, 53 Mo. 44; St. Joseph v. Anthony, 30 Mo. 537; Neenan v. Smith, 50 Mo. 525; Kiley v. Cranor, 51 Mo. 541; Rutherford v. Hamilton,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by303 opinions

  1. A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. LeserSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

298 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API