Sledge v. Stolz
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action tried hy the court without a jury to have a decree declaring that plaintiffs are the owners of certain mining claims free and clear from any rights acquired by defendants or any of them thereto, under the certain agreement and deed mentioned in the complaint.
A general demurrer to the complaint was overruled and defendants answered and went to trial on the merits. Findings of fact were in favor of plaintiffs and judgment was entered in accordance therewith. Defendant, Tuolumne Deep Channel Mining Company (hereinafter referred to as the Mining Company), appealed from the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Acme Oil and Mining Co. v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Richter v. RichterIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Stilwell v. KnapperIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Ransome-Crummey Co. v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Alder v. DrudisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Hall v. AugurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Taylor v. Kingman Feldspar Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Biescar v. Czechoslovak-PatronatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.