Legal Opinion
J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 28, 1964No. 18695_1PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
Appellants brought this diversity action in the district court for recovery of certain mining properties, for an accounting, and for damages. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. 1 Appellee raised the defense, inter alia, that the claim for recovery of the properties was barred by the five year statute of limitations of California Code of Civil Procedure § 318. 2 After a hearing limited to this particular issue, the district court concluded that the claim for recovery of property was so barred and entered judgment as to that claim pursuant to Ped.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Appellants appeal from that…
2Cases cited94 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- United States v. John Paul WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Phillip L. Lindquist v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Manchester Band of Pomo Indians, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Joe Turner v. Charles H. LundquistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.