Treweek v. Howard
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This is an action to recover from the defendants the sum of ten. thousand dollars upon the *438official bond of defendant Bowman, executed by him as principal, and by the other defendants as sureties for . the faithful discharge of the duties of said Bowman as executor of the last will of Nicholas Treweek, deceased.
The cause was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury, and written findings filed, upon which judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff for ten thousand two hundred and sixty dollars and sixty cents, interest and costs.
The sureties, Howard and Brittan, appeal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennie v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Irwin v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Murdock v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Coburn v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Haskell v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Wood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Estate of King v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lambert v. Southern Counties Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Walker v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.